Monday, February 13, 2012

A Comparison in Network News

               Whitney Huston, a name that happens to be all over the place the past couple of days.  If you did not know who this American singer was before Saturday February 11, 2012 I think it’s safe to say you do now. A vast majority of media forms are currently covering her “tragic” death. I put tragic in quotation marks because it is a matter of opinion. While, some news forms may promote this event as tragic, others simply cover it as another news story.
               I watched a news report on Whitney Huston on two completely different network news stations to compare and contrast how different or, alike they would turn out to be. The two news stations were CNN and Al Jazeera English. While there is not a sense of political bias or even international bias in either one of these stations, Al Jazeera was insurmountably more biased then CNN.
CNN did a rather impressive job of using agenda setting. Where they did in fact tell us what to think about, they did not tell us how to think about it. Where the counter news network Al Jazeera clearly used emotion dimension a lot. This is when feelings are created by the media message(s).  Al Jazeera was extremely biased in their coverage of Huston. They even created bias within our nation implying that her death hit harder in New Jersey were she was born, and  Los Angeles where she died. Therefore, implying further that elsewhere in the country was not hit as hard.
Finally, CNN reported her death. Plain and simple, that is what they did. They told the public what happened, to who, when, and where. They also gave a brief overview of her life and her accomplishments. They did not, make Huston out to be somebody she wasn’t, more important or “loved” then she really was. They told the truth. The only thing the two networks had in common they both said who, what, when, and where. Both omitted why due to lack of information and both gave an overview of her life and accomplishments. In complete contrast, Al Jazeera completely glorified her life, in her death. They subliminally told you to feel sad, to feel the loss. They made her up to be way more important to the American public then she was.
  My final assessment? CNN did a much better job covering the story, while Al Jazeera fed the story. They used the media to get more attention and lengthened out the story with bias views. They were untrue and too opiniated. I want to know the details, not what they think I felt of her. Yes, she was a great singer, many liked her but she was not as liked as they portrayed. To end with I’ll state how utterly shocked I was to see how different, and how bias or unbiased two stations could be when covering the same story. A true eye opener.

1 comment:

  1. Ashley -- it really can be an eye-opener to watch more than one news outlet. Can you provide some details or quotes to support your assertions about the style of each story? BTW, your first sentence is a fragment. I'm using these blogs as a way to help students practice, practice, practice their academic, third-person writing style. Since you're interested in writing professionally, I strongly urge you to pick up that recommended Strunk & White book.

    ReplyDelete